Wing-Shing Chan

406 citations
5 papers · 322 indexed · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Wing-Shing Chan

4 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Wing-Shing Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Health 54
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Statistics and Probability 41
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
Replace Cristian A. Rojas‐Barahona with:
Cristian A. Rojas‐Barahona Chile
James J. Hennessy United States
Amanda C. Gottschall United States
Symen A. Brouwers South Africa
Kristine D. O’Laughlin United States
Wendy Rodgers United States
Kira Rodriguez United States
Ruth W. Edwards United States
Kimberly Petersen United Kingdom
Matt Brown United Kingdom
Wing-Shing Chan relative to Cristian A. Rojas‐Barahona Chile Cristian A. Rojas‐Barahona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cristian A. Rojas‐Barahona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing-Shing Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing-Shing Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing-Shing Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing-Shing Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing-Shing Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing-Shing Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing-Shing Chan. The network helps show where Wing-Shing Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Wing-Shing Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing-Shing Chan Line = papers co-authored together Wing-Shing Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Wing-Shing Chan

Wing-Shing Chan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 5 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper) and Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (54 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Statistics and Probability (41 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations). Wing-Shing Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W. Raudenbush, Lee Ching Ng, Dawn Lim, Fiona Stapleton and Duoduo Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency and Journal Français d Ophtalmologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact