Wim van der Stelt
-
- Academic Publishing and Open Access 1
- Information Systems top 10%
-
- Libraries and Information Services 2
-
- Digital Innovation in Industries 1
-
- Corporate Governance and Management 1
- Co-authors
- Robert KileyMichael JubbJean‐Claude GuédonP. Igo-KemenesSimon BellSünje Dallmeier-TiessenMartin HallDavid Ross
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyInformation Systems and ManagementHistory and Philosophy of Science
- Journals
- Information Services & Use (1 paper)MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (4 papers)Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wim van der Stelt
9 papers receiving 123 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 71
- Information Systems and Management 57
- History and Philosophy of Science 15
- Computer Science Applications 16
- Information Systems 50
Countries citing papers authored by Wim van der Stelt
This map shows the geographic impact of Wim van der Stelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim van der Stelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim van der Stelt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wim van der Stelt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim van der Stelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim van der Stelt. The network helps show where Wim van der Stelt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wim van der Stelt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 6 | The landscape of Open Access Publishing today | 2011 | 2 |
| 7 | Open Access Publishing today: what scientists do and why | 2011 | 1 |
| 8 | Study of Open Access Publishing | 2010 | 2 |
| 9 | Open Access Publishing - Models and Attributes | 2010 | 25 |
| 10 | First results of the SOAP Project | 2010 | 6 |
| 11 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 12 | Springer Open Choice | 2008 | 4 |
About Wim van der Stelt
Wim van der Stelt is a scholar working on Museology, Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Libraries and Information Services (2 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (1 paper), Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper) and Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (71 citations), Information Systems and Management (57 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (15 citations), Computer Science Applications (16 citations) and Information Systems (50 citations). Wim van der Stelt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Kiley, Michael Jubb, Jean‐Claude Guédon, P. Igo-Kemenes, Simon Bell, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Martin Hall, David Ross, Bianca Kramer and S. Mele. Their work appears in journals such as Information Services & Use, MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society), Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja, Journal of Information Processing and Management and Open Collections.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.