Wilma King
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 7
- Critical Race Theory in Education 1
- Cuban History and Society 1
- Co-authors
- Marie Jenkins Schwartz (1 shared paper)Darlene Clark Hine (2 shared papers)Linda Reed (2 shared papers)Rosalyn Terborg-Penn (1 shared paper)Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham (1 shared paper)Elsa Barkley Brown (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Southern History (2 papers)Feminist Studies (1 paper)Journal of American History (1 paper)The Journal of African American History (2 papers)Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Wilma King
7 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Anthropology 30
- Gender Studies 26
- Cultural Studies 22
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- History 18
Countries citing papers authored by Wilma King
This map shows the geographic impact of Wilma King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilma King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilma King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wilma King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilma King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilma King. The network helps show where Wilma King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Wilma King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | We Specialize in the Wholly Impossible: A Reader in Black Women's History | 1995 | 50 |
| 2 | 2000 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 9 | Stolen Childhood, Second Edition: Slave Youth in Nineteenth-Century America | 2011 | 0 |
About Wilma King
Wilma King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Anthropology and Marketing, having authored 9 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper), Cuban History and Society (1 paper) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (30 citations), Gender Studies (26 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations) and History (18 citations). Wilma King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marie Jenkins Schwartz, Darlene Clark Hine, Linda Reed, Rosalyn Terborg-Penn, Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham and Elsa Barkley Brown. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, Feminist Studies, Journal of American History, The Journal of African American History and Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.