William W. Wong

13.9k total citations
221 papers, 9.7k citations indexed

About

William W. Wong is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, William W. Wong has authored 221 papers receiving a total of 9.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 99 papers in Physiology, 64 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 52 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in William W. Wong's work include Body Composition Measurement Techniques (53 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (45 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (36 papers). William W. Wong is often cited by papers focused on Body Composition Measurement Techniques (53 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (45 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (36 papers). William W. Wong collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. William W. Wong's co-authors include Kenneth J. Ellis, Nancy F. Butte, Peter Klein, Judy M. Hopkinson, E. O’Brian Smith, Steven A. Abrams, E. O’Brian Smith, David L. Hachey, Roman J. Shypailo and Cutberto Garza and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

William W. Wong

215 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Peers

William W. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Physiology 3.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.9k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 2.2k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.1k
  • Epidemiology 1.1k
Replace Kenneth J. Ellis with:
Kenneth J. Ellis United States
Matthew P. Longnecker United States
Hans Demmelmair Germany
Michael Symonds United Kingdom
William B. Grant United States
Janet C. King United States
Paul Taylor United Kingdom
Tai C. Chen United States
Jesús Vioqué Spain
John Thompson New Zealand
Kenneth J. Ellis United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William W. Wong
William W. Wong · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William W. Wong
William W. Wong · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Wong. The network helps show where William W. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Wong. William W. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 37
3 11
4 9
5 87
6 8
7 12
8 48
9 25
10 210
11 12
12 37
13 24
14 136
15 15
16 11
17 3
18 140
19 70
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026