William W. Pendlebury
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel P. PerlPaul R. SolomonDavid G. MuñozRup TandanTimothy J. FriesWalter G. BradleyJingdong ZhangPifu Luo
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers)Neurological diseases and metabolism (7 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBrain
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
William W. Pendlebury
60 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Molecular Biology 439
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 359
- Physiology 324
- Neurology 310
- Neurology 211
Countries citing papers authored by William W. Pendlebury
This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Pendlebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Pendlebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Pendlebury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Pendlebury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Pendlebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Pendlebury. The network helps show where William W. Pendlebury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Pendlebury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Pendlebury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Pendlebury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Pendlebury. William W. Pendlebury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Creating an Online CME Module: Early Detection and Diagnosis of Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 80 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 80 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About William W. Pendlebury
William W. Pendlebury is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (211 citations), Neurology (310 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (359 citations). William W. Pendlebury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Daniel P. Perl, Paul R. Solomon, David G. Muñoz, Rup Tandan, Timothy J. Fries, Walter G. Bradley, Jingdong Zhang, Pifu Luo, M. F. Beal and Steven P. Braff. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.