William Singleton

907 citations
42 papers · 640 indexed · h-index 16

William Singleton

40 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers

William Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Genetics 183
  • Neurology 100
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 111
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 81
  • Analytical Chemistry 38
Replace Yanchao Liu with:
Yanchao Liu China
Jenna L Leclerc United States
Fengyuan Che China
Yoshio Omote Japan
George J. Grega United States
Yonglin Zhao China
Howard L. Foyt United States
Weidong Hu China
Pedro Norat United States
Vered Gazit United States
William Singleton relative to Yanchao Liu China Yanchao Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×38×
Yanchao Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Singleton. The network helps show where William Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Singleton Line = papers co-authored together William Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20211
4 20212
5 20205
6 202017
7 20198
8 201829
9 201752
10 201720
11 201745
12 20148
13 201120
14 20095
15 20095
16 200018
17 198744
18 19783
19
Proceedings: Comparison of antihypertensive effectiveness of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with different pharmacological properties.
19763
20 197673

About William Singleton

William Singleton is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (5 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (4 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (3 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (183 citations), Neurology (100 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (111 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (81 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (38 citations). William Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Udho Thadani, C Davidson, S. H. Taylor, Daniel J. Asby, Alison Bienemann, DA Cox, Marcella Wyatt, Kathreena M. Kurian, Ivan N. Mefford and Stephen P. Lowis. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, World Neurosurgery and Histopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026