William Seltzer

4.9k citations
80 papers · 2.5k indexed · h-index 26

William Seltzer

76 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

William Seltzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Neurology 614
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 604
  • Genetics 243
  • Neurology 171
  • Genetics 492
Replace Elizabeth Moore with:
Elizabeth Moore United States
Marc Abramowicz Belgium
Louise Nicholson New Zealand
Peter Ainsworth Canada
Biplab Dasgupta United States
John Guy United States
Catherine Ellis United States
Shelin Adam Canada
Cosette Martin France
Kym M. Boycott Canada
William Seltzer relative to Elizabeth Moore United States Elizabeth Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Seltzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Seltzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Seltzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Seltzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Seltzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Seltzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Seltzer. The network helps show where William Seltzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Seltzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Seltzer Line = papers co-authored together William Seltzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 2012188
3 200813
4
Challenges to the confidentiality of U.S. Federal statistics, 1910-1965
200716
5 20074
6 20033
7 2003215
8 200214
9 200237
10
The Dark Side of Numbers: The Role of Population Data Systems in Human Rights Abuses
200146
11 19994
12 199839
13 199225
14 199127
15 198948
16 198916
17 196915
18
Benchmark Demographic Data for Pakistan: A Review of Summary Estimates Derived from the PGE Experiment
19685
19 19673
20 19652

About William Seltzer

William Seltzer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (13 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (10 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (8 papers), Census and Population Estimation (8 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (6 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (6 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (614 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (604 citations), Genetics (243 citations), Neurology (171 citations) and Genetics (492 citations). William Seltzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Edward R.B. McCabe, Mary G. Powers, Margo Anderson, M L Law, Shu‐Zhen Huang, Tetsuo Ashizawa, Michael A. Boss, Nicholas T. Potter, Matthew J. Farrer and Corinne D. Boehm. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, International Migration Review, Population Studies, Poultry Science and Genetics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026