William Ratliff

1.3k citations
47 papers · 552 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Ratliff

43 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

William Ratliff
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Health Informatics 172
  • Health Information Management 69
  • Development 29
  • Family Practice 11
  • Artificial Intelligence 120
Replace Ana Beduschi with:
Ana Beduschi United Kingdom
Sonia Allan Australia
Mélanie Bourassa Forcier Canada
Thomas Ploug Denmark
Stefan Germann United States
Gherardo Carullo Italy
Ferry Fadzlul Rahman Indonesia
Benjamin Chin‐Yee Canada
Felix Gille Switzerland
Kayte Spector‐Bagdady United States
William Ratliff relative to Ana Beduschi United Kingdom Ana Beduschi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Ana Beduschi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ratliff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ratliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ratliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ratliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ratliff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ratliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ratliff. The network helps show where William Ratliff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Ratliff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ratliff Line = papers co-authored together William Ratliff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020103
2 202097
3 202078
4 202028
5 202422
6
Law and Economics in Developing Countries
200019
7 196918
8 197218
9 200917
10 196917
11 197114
12 199714
13 19999
14 20236
15 20246
16 20245
17 20225
18 19775
19 19725
20 20195

About William Ratliff

William Ratliff is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Political Science and International Relations, Health Informatics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 47 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (6 papers), Cuban History and Society (5 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (3 papers), International Relations in Latin America (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (172 citations), Health Information Management (69 citations), Development (29 citations), Family Practice (11 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (120 citations). William Ratliff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Mark Sendak, Suresh Balu, Michael Gao, Marshall Nichols, Cara O’Brien, Armando Bedoya, Edgardo Buscaglia, Sahil Sandhu, Jessica Sperling and Joseph Futoma. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, Annals of Emergency Medicine, npj Digital Medicine, Foreign Affairs and Asian Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact