Mélanie Bourassa Forcier

7 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Mélanie Bourassa Forcier
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Economics and Econometrics 120
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
  • Emergency Medical Services 58
  • General Health Professions 53
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 42
Replace Jacek Klich with:
Jacek Klich Poland
Annika Herr Germany
Graham Cookson United Kingdom
Margit Sommersguter‐Reichmann Austria
John C. Goodman United States
Paula González Spain
Boris Augurzky Germany
Martijn van Hasselt United States
Judy Li New Zealand
Mélanie Bourassa Forcier relative to Jacek Klich Poland Jacek Klich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jacek Klich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mélanie Bourassa Forcier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mélanie Bourassa Forcier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mélanie Bourassa Forcier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mélanie Bourassa Forcier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mélanie Bourassa Forcier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mélanie Bourassa Forcier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mélanie Bourassa Forcier. The network helps show where Mélanie Bourassa Forcier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mélanie Bourassa Forcier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mélanie Bourassa Forcier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mélanie Bourassa Forcier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mélanie Bourassa Forcier. Mélanie Bourassa Forcier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
Encadrement normatif et contractuel des pratiques de téléconsultation en clinique de première ligne
1
3 3
4 65
5
Fonctionnement du marché des assurances privées de personnes dans le cadre de l’assurance médicaments et son encadrement réglementaire au Québec (ANNEXES)
1
6 2
7 1
8 251

About Mélanie Bourassa Forcier

Mélanie Bourassa Forcier is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Pharmacology and Pharmacy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (36 citations), Emergency Medical Services (58 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (39 citations). Mélanie Bourassa Forcier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Giuffrida, Steven Simoens, Siobhan Mullan, Jean‐Frédéric Morin, Chantal Viscogliosi, Pierre‐Carl Michaud, Aurélie Côté‐Sergent and Bessam Abdulrazak. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resources for Health, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement and Journal of Law and the Biosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026