Jill L. King

824 total citations
54 papers, 646 citations indexed

About

Jill L. King is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Jill L. King has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 646 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 15 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Jill L. King's work include Radiology practices and education (15 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (12 papers) and AI in cancer detection (12 papers). Jill L. King is often cited by papers focused on Radiology practices and education (15 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (12 papers) and AI in cancer detection (12 papers). Jill L. King collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Jill L. King's co-authors include David Gur, Howard E. Rockette, Amy H. Klym, Carl R. Fuhrman, Jules H. Sumkin, Julie Markant, Cynthia A. Britton, Andriy I. Bandos, Marie A. Ganott and Annette E. Fleckenstein and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Scientific Reports and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Jill L. King

52 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Jill L. King
Marco D. Sorani United States
Sung South Korea
John‐Paul J. Yu United States
David B. Finlay United Kingdom
Peter Sutton United Kingdom
Fu Siong Ng United Kingdom
Samy Sadek Kuwait
Katherine Hewitt United Kingdom
Mandar A. Aras United States
Rasmus Røge Denmark
Marco D. Sorani United States
Jill L. King
Citations per year, relative to Jill L. King Jill L. King (= 1×) peers Marco D. Sorani

Countries citing papers authored by Jill L. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill L. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill L. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill L. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill L. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill L. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill L. King. The network helps show where Jill L. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill L. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill L. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill L. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill L. King. Jill L. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Jill L. & Julie Markant. (2020). Individual differences in selective attention and scanning dynamics influence children’s learning from relevant non-targets in a visual search task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 193. 104797–104797. 13 indexed citations
2.
King, Jill L., S. Nicole Fearnbach, Paula J. Geiselman, et al.. (2018). Perceptual Characterization of the Macronutrient Picture System (MaPS) for Food Image fMRI. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 17–17. 19 indexed citations
3.
Mannava, Sandeep, Kaitlyn E. Whitney, Mitchell I. Kennedy, et al.. (2018). The Influence of Naproxen on Biological Factors in Leukocyte‐Rich Platelet‐Rich Plasma: A Prospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 35(1). 201–210. 30 indexed citations
4.
Gur, David, Amy H. Klym, Jill L. King, Andriy I. Bandos, & Jules H. Sumkin. (2015). Impact of the New Density Reporting Laws. Academic Radiology. 22(6). 679–683. 11 indexed citations
5.
Baucum, Anthony J., Jill L. King, Glen Cook, et al.. (2009). Mechanisms Underlying Methamphetamine-Induced Dopamine Transporter Complex Formation. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 329(1). 169–174. 29 indexed citations
6.
Gur, David, Andriy I. Bandos, Jill L. King, et al.. (2008). Binary and multi‐category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: A comparison. Medical Physics. 35(10). 4404–4409. 4 indexed citations
7.
Volz, Trent J., et al.. (2007). Methylphenidate Administration Alters Vesicular Monoamine Transporter-2 Function in Cytoplasmic and Membrane-Associated Vesicles. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 323(2). 738–745. 38 indexed citations
8.
Gur, David, Amy H. Klym, Jill L. King, et al.. (2006). The Effect of Image Display Size on Observer Performance. Academic Radiology. 13(4). 409–413. 10 indexed citations
9.
Ganott, Marie A., Jules H. Sumkin, Jill L. King, et al.. (2006). Screening Mammography: Do Women Prefer a Higher Recall Rate Given the Possibility of Earlier Detection of Cancer?. Radiology. 238(3). 793–800. 42 indexed citations
10.
Klym, Amy H., Jill L. King, & Lara A. Hardesty. (2004). The effect of routine use of a computer-aided detection system on the practice of breast imagers. Academic Radiology. 11(6). 711–713. 1 indexed citations
11.
Swensson, Richard G., Jill L. King, & David Gur. (2001). A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation. Medical Physics. 28(8). 1597–1609. 14 indexed citations
12.
Swensson, Richard G., Jill L. King, Walter F. Good, & David Gur. (2000). Observer variation and the performance accuracy gained by averaging ratings of abnormality. Medical Physics. 27(8). 1920–1933. 14 indexed citations
13.
Swensson, Richard G., Glenn S. Maitz, Jill L. King, & David Gur. (1999). <title>Using incomplete and imprecise localization data on images to improve estimates of detection accuracy</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3663. 74–81. 5 indexed citations
14.
Rockette, Howard E., William L. Campbell, Cynthia A. Britton, et al.. (1999). Empiric assessment of parameters that affect the design of multireader receiver operating characteristic studies. Academic Radiology. 6(12). 723–729. 28 indexed citations
15.
Shaw, Chris C., Jill L. King, Thomas Chang, et al.. (1998). Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: A receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images. Academic Radiology. 5(3). 173–180. 15 indexed citations
16.
Gur, David, et al.. (1997). Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: A comparison. Journal of Digital Imaging. 10(3). 103–107. 23 indexed citations
17.
King, Jill L., Cynthia A. Britton, David Gur, Howard E. Rockette, & Peter L. Davis. (1993). On the Validity of the Continuous and Discrete Confidence Rating Scales in Receiver Operating Characteristic Studies. Investigative Radiology. 28(10). 962–963. 15 indexed citations
18.
Rockette, Howard E., David Gur, Lawrence A. Cooperstein, et al.. (1990). Effect of Two Rating Formats in Multi-Disease ROC Study of Chest Images. Investigative Radiology. 25(3). 225–228. 9 indexed citations
19.
King, Jill L., et al.. (1990). Nonheme Iron Evaluation of a Hemoglobin Iron Concentrate. Journal of Food Science. 55(2). 593–594. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026