William R. King
-
- Information Technology Governance and Strategy 6
- Health top 5%
- Gun Ownership and Violence Research 5
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Regulation and Compliance Studies 10
-
- Policing Practices and Perceptions 24
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 23
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 6
- Workplace Violence and Bullying 4
-
- Data-Driven Disease Surveillance 4
- Co-authors
- Edward R. MaguireBradley A. CampbellJohn H. GrantM.D. FrancisVarun GroverTasha A. MenakerCharles M. KatzMarion D. Francis
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
William R. King
63 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Management Information Systems 165
- Health 144
- Strategy and Management 252
- Political Science and International Relations 388
- Sociology and Political Science 586
Countries citing papers authored by William R. King
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. King. The network helps show where William R. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William R. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 85 | |
| 6 | Opening the Black Box of NIBIN: A Descriptive Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Use of NIBIN and Its Effects on Criminal Investigations, Final Report | 2013 | 8 |
| 7 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 13 | Accidents and falls in later life | 2002 | 3 |
| 14 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 9 | |
| 16 | Interdependency of the Determinants of User Interaction and Usage: An Empirical Test | 1996 | 4 |
| 17 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 20 | The logic of strategic planning | 1982 | 86 |
About William R. King
William R. King is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Strategy and Management, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (24 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (23 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (10 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (5 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (4 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (165 citations), Health (144 citations) and Strategy and Management (252 citations). William R. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Edward R. Maguire, Bradley A. Campbell, John H. Grant, M.D. Francis, Varun Grover, Tasha A. Menaker, Charles M. Katz, Marion D. Francis, Lawrence Flora and Thomas M. Dunn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.