William R. Crum
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 1%
- Co-authors
- Nick C. FoxDavid HillMartin N. RossorRachael I. ScahillÓscar CámaraThomas HartkensDennis ChanJohn Stevens
- Topics
- Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (27 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers)Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (21 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetPLoS ONEBiomaterials
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
William R. Crum
96 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
- Physiology 1.2k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Crum
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Crum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Crum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Crum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Crum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Crum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Crum. The network helps show where William R. Crum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Crum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Crum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Crum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Crum. William R. Crum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 71 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 71 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | Accuracy assessment of global and local atrophy measurement techniques with realistic simulated longitudinal data | 2 |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 78 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 152 | |
| 19 | 349 | |
| 20 | 344 |
About William R. Crum
William R. Crum is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computational Mathematics and Neurology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (27 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations). William R. Crum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nick C. Fox, David Hill, Martin N. Rossor, Rachael I. Scahill, Óscar Cámara, Thomas Hartkens, Dennis Chan, John Stevens, David J. Hawkes and Jennifer L. Whitwell. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.