Richard Gale
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert L. JohnstonBruno ZuberbühlerMartin McKibbinSobha SivaprasadManuel SaldañaFaruque GhanchiWinfried M. K. AmoakuLouise Downey
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (51 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (41 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Richard Gale
95 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Ophthalmology 1.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 353
- Epidemiology 313
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 149
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Gale
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Gale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Gale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Gale. The network helps show where Richard Gale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Gale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Gale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Gale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Gale. Richard Gale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Acceptability of OCT angiography: A multicentre OCT Angiography NEtwork (OCTANE) study | 1 |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMDbreakdown → | 262 |
| 16 | Improved Response To Ranibizumab In Ex And Current Smokers With Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), But No Evidence That CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1 Or VEGF Genotypes Predict Treatment Outcome | 3 |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | How to court a clinician. | 1 |
| 19 | Comparing Coastal Spheres in Oregon and Washington | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Richard Gale
Richard Gale is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Family Practice, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (51 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (41 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k citations) and Neurology (105 citations). Richard Gale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Johnston, Bruno Zuberbühler, Martin McKibbin, Sobha Sivaprasad, Manuel Saldaña, Faruque Ghanchi, Winfried M. K. Amoaku, Louise Downey, Sajjad Mahmood and Yit C. Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.