Richard Gale
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 51
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 34
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 13
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 7
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 5
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 41
- Neurology top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 7
-
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research 5
- Co-authors
- Robert L. JohnstonBruno ZuberbühlerMartin McKibbinSobha SivaprasadManuel SaldañaFaruque GhanchiWinfried M. K. AmoakuLouise Downey
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Richard Gale
95 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Ophthalmology 1.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.2k
- Neurology 105
- Epidemiology 313
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 149
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Gale
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Gale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Gale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Gale. The network helps show where Richard Gale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Gale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 10 | Acceptability of OCT angiography: A multicentre OCT Angiography NEtwork (OCTANE) study | 2019 | 1 |
| 11 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 15 | Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMDbreakdown → | 2015 | 262 |
| 16 | Improved Response To Ranibizumab In Ex And Current Smokers With Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), But No Evidence That CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1 Or VEGF Genotypes Predict Treatment Outcome | 2012 | 3 |
| 17 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 18 | How to court a clinician. | 1990 | 1 |
| 19 | Comparing Coastal Spheres in Oregon and Washington | 1987 | 1 |
| 20 | 1969 | 1 |
About Richard Gale
Richard Gale is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Family Practice, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (51 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (41 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (34 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k citations) and Neurology (105 citations). Richard Gale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Johnston, Bruno Zuberbühler, Martin McKibbin, Sobha Sivaprasad, Manuel Saldaña, Faruque Ghanchi, Winfried M. K. Amoaku, Louise Downey, Sajjad Mahmood and Yit C. Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.