William R. Conner
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect behavior and control techniques
Papers in
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 12
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 7
- Insect and Pesticide Research 5
- Insect behavior and control techniques 2
-
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy 3
- Co-authors
- Michael Turelli (6 shared papers)Brandon S. Cooper (9 shared papers)Ary A. Hoffmann (4 shared papers)Peter Kriesner (1 shared paper)Andrew R. Weeks (1 shared paper)Joanna C. Chiu (3 shared papers)Daniel R. Matute (1 shared paper)Dan Vanderpool (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Biology (2 papers)Ecology and Evolution (2 papers)Evolution (2 papers)Microbiology Spectrum (1 paper)Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaBrazil
In The Last Decade
William R. Conner
12 papers receiving 493 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Horticulture 44
- Insect Science 434
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
- Genetics 66
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 39
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Conner
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Conner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Conner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Conner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Conner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Conner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Conner. The network helps show where William R. Conner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William R. Conner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About William R. Conner
William R. Conner is a scholar working on Insect Science, Horticulture, Genetics, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (12 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (3 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper) and Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (44 citations), Insect Science (434 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (67 citations), Genetics (66 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (39 citations). William R. Conner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Michael Turelli, Brandon S. Cooper, Ary A. Hoffmann, Peter Kriesner, Andrew R. Weeks, Joanna C. Chiu, Daniel R. Matute, Dan Vanderpool, Kelly M. Richardson and Kevin J. Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Evolution, Microbiology Spectrum and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.