Sarah Biber

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 750 citations indexed

About

Sarah Biber is a scholar working on Insect Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Biber has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 750 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Insect Science, 1 paper in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 1 paper in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Sarah Biber's work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper). Sarah Biber is often cited by papers focused on Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper). Sarah Biber collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. Sarah Biber's co-authors include John H. Werren, Seth R. Bordenstein, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, Hervé Tettelin, Martin Maiden, Keith A. Jolley, Cheryl Y. Hayashi, Laura Baldo, Joyce M. Sakamoto and Vishvanath Nene and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, PLoS Genetics and Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Biber

5 papers receiving 744 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Multilocus Sequence Typing System for the EndosymbiontWolbachia pipientis

2006 665 citations Laura Baldo, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah Biber United States	3	706	120	93	87	64	5	750
Lawrence Bellamy United Kingdom	3	515 0.7×	94 0.8×	116 1.2×	38 0.4×	74 1.2×	4	557
Ewa Chrostek United Kingdom	9	566 0.8×	69 0.6×	46 0.5×	162 1.9×	62 1.0×	10	599
Roman Zug Germany	6	1.1k 1.5×	138 1.1×	83 0.9×	277 3.2×	115 1.8×	10	1.1k
William R. Conner United States	10	426 0.6×	67 0.6×	40 0.4×	69 0.8×	56 0.9×	14	482
Sarah N. Cockburn Canada	5	443 0.6×	107 0.9×	99 1.1×	19 0.2×	76 1.2×	5	532
Dominique Bertrand United Kingdom	7	748 1.1×	106 0.9×	138 1.5×	40 0.5×	99 1.5×	8	777
Crystal L. Frost United Kingdom	11	357 0.5×	157 1.3×	91 1.0×	23 0.3×	60 0.9×	14	484
Patrizia Scuppa Italy	9	446 0.6×	49 0.4×	52 0.6×	268 3.1×	74 1.2×	10	508
Vangelis Doudoumis Greece	9	471 0.7×	37 0.3×	28 0.3×	104 1.2×	60 0.9×	15	547
P. Nardon France	10	560 0.8×	104 0.9×	51 0.5×	30 0.3×	160 2.5×	26	632

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Biber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Biber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Biber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Biber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Biber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Biber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Biber. The network helps show where Sarah Biber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Biber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Biber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Biber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Biber. Sarah Biber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Lane, Kathleen A., Sujuan Gao, Omolola A. Adeoye‐Olatunde, et al.. (2024). Referral Sources Across Racial and Ethnic Groups at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 101(4). 1167–1176. 2 indexed citations

2.

Harrison, Theresa M., Susan Landau, Suzanne L. Baker, et al.. (2023). Harmonization of amyloid and tau PET tracers in a multi‐center cohort from NIA Alzheimer’s disease research centers in the United States. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 19(S16). 1 indexed citations

3.

Signore, Steven J. Del, et al.. (2017). dOCRL maintains immune cell quiescence by regulating endosomal traffic. PLoS Genetics. 13(10). e1007052–e1007052. 13 indexed citations

4.

Ishmael, Nadeeza, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, Panagiotis Ioannidis, et al.. (2009). Extensive genomic diversity of closely related Wolbachia strains. Microbiology. 155(7). 2211–2222. 69 indexed citations

5.

Baldo, Laura, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, Keith A. Jolley, et al.. (2006). Multilocus Sequence Typing System for the EndosymbiontWolbachia pipientis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72(11). 7098–7110. 665 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact