Thomas L. Schmidt
- Insect Science top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ary A. HoffmannAndrew R. WeeksMoshe JasperHartmut RehbeinJessica ChungGordana RašićNancy M. Endersby‐HarshmanIgor Filipović
- Topics
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (18 papers)Mosquito-borne diseases and control (17 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Schmidt
36 papers receiving 799 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Insect Science 337
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 313
- Genetics 185
- Molecular Biology 183
- Ecology 139
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Schmidt. The network helps show where Thomas L. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Schmidt. Thomas L. Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 106 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | Differentiation of Wild Salmon, Conventionally and Organically Farmed Salmon | 8 |
About Thomas L. Schmidt
Thomas L. Schmidt is a scholar working on Insect Science, Horticulture and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (18 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (17 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (337 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (313 citations) and Dermatology (73 citations). Thomas L. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ary A. Hoffmann, Andrew R. Weeks, Moshe Jasper, Hartmut Rehbein, Jessica Chung, Gordana Rašić, Nancy M. Endersby‐Harshman, Igor Filipović, Ute Ostermeyer and Anthony van Rooyen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, The American Naturalist and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.