Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Corporate philanthropic practices
2006500 citationsWilliam O. Brown, Eric Helland et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William O. Brown
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William O. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William O. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William O. Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William O. Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William O. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William O. Brown. The network helps show where William O. Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William O. Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William O. Brown.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William O. Brown based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William O. Brown. William O. Brown is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pu, Zhaoxia, Eric R. Pardyjak, Sebastian W. Hoch, et al.. (2023). Cold Fog Amongst Complex Terrain. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 104(11). E2030–E2052.5 indexed citations
Brown, William O. & Eric Helland. (2006). Corporate Philanthropic Practices. Econstor (Econstor).30 indexed citations
9.
Brown, William O.. (2005). The Sierra Rotors Project, Observations of Mountain Waves.2 indexed citations
10.
Brown, William O.. (2005). A Demonstration of a Scanning Multiple Antenna UHF Radar.1 indexed citations
11.
Brown, William O., Richard C. K. Burdekin, & Marc Weidenmier. (2004). Consols, Financial Stability, and Pax Britannia. Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
12.
Stenner, Michael D., William O. Brown, Olivier Pfister, & D. Gauthier. (2000). Observation of polarization instabilities in a two-photon laser.. 14.1 indexed citations
Gauthier, D., William O. Brown, Jeffrey R. Gardner, & R. Vilaseca. (1997). Laser Beam Amplification Resulting From Collective Atomic Recoil. Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference. 110–111.1 indexed citations
Brown, William O., et al.. (1995). Multiple antenna FDI observations on the MU radar. 384.2 indexed citations
17.
Sauer, Raymond D. & William O. Brown. (1993). Does the basketball market believe in the hot hand? Comment. American Economic Review. 83(5). 1377–1386.70 indexed citations
18.
Brown, William O. & G. J. Fraser. (1991). Radar interferometry on MF SA radar. 248.2 indexed citations
19.
Ross, D. B., J. P. McFadden, B. Au, & William O. Brown. (1974). A remote sensing study of Pacific hurricane Ava.9 indexed citations
20.
Brown, William O., et al.. (1958). Transition in Africa : studies in political adaptation.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.