Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Attribution of extreme weather and climate‐related events
2015518 citationsPeter A. Stott, Nikolaos Christidis et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Walton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Walton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Walton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Walton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Walton. The network helps show where Peter Walton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Walton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Walton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Walton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Walton. Peter Walton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walton, Peter, et al.. (2018). Company voluntary arrangements: evaluating success and failure. Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University).2 indexed citations
Otto, Juliane, Calum Brown, Carlo Buontempo, et al.. (2016). Uncertainty: Lessons Learned for Climate Services. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 97(12). ES265–ES269.28 indexed citations
10.
Walton, Peter. (2013). "Inability to pay debts": beyond the point of no return?. Journal of business law. 212–236.1 indexed citations
11.
Walton, Peter. (2011). When Is Pre-Packaged Administration Appropriate?-A Theoretical Consideration. 20. 1.3 indexed citations
12.
Walton, Peter. (2011). An executive guide to IFRS : content, costs and benefits to business. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).16 indexed citations
13.
Walton, Peter & Rob Lamb. (2010). Crossing the river: Developing a strategy to support understanding of uncertainty within probabilistic climate projections..1 indexed citations
Keay, Andrew & Peter Walton. (2003). Insolvency law : corporate and personal. Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton).14 indexed citations
17.
Walton, Peter, Axel Haller, & Bernard Raffournier. (2003). International accounting. 2nd edition. Open Research Online (The Open University).32 indexed citations
18.
Walton, Peter. (2003). Execution Creditors - (almost) the Last Rights in Insolvency. Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton).1 indexed citations
19.
Walton, Peter, et al.. (2001). Fixed and floating charges-a revelation. Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton). 123–149.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.