Shlomo Weber

130 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Shlomo Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.3k
  • Atmospheric Science 677
  • Political Science and International Relations 568
  • Management Science and Operations Research 434
  • Global and Planetary Change 411
Replace Richard Cornes with:
Richard Cornes United Kingdom
David J. Cooper United States
Robert Warren United States
Andrew Millington United Kingdom
Martin Bell United Kingdom
Carlo Jaeger Germany
Michael T. Ewing Australia
Melvin J. Dubnick United States
Harold L. Cole United States
Thomas Homer‐Dixon Canada
Shlomo Weber relative to Richard Cornes United Kingdom Richard Cornes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Cornes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shlomo Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shlomo Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shlomo Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shlomo Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shlomo Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shlomo Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shlomo Weber. The network helps show where Shlomo Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shlomo Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shlomo Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shlomo Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shlomo Weber. Shlomo Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 72
3
Valence Influence in Electoral Competition with Rank Objectives
2
4
Linguistic Distances and Their Use in Economics
2
5 1
6 3
7 69
8
Immigration Quotas in the Globalized Economy
0
9
Existence of Pure Strategies Nash Equilibria in Social Interaction Games with Dyadic Externalities
1
10 85
11 22
12 4
13 2
14 50
15 369
16
Endogenous Trade Policy Under FDI
4
17
On the Efficiency of Retaliation Rules in International Trade
1
18 8
19
Tiebout equilibrium under restricted preferences domain
4
20 12

About Shlomo Weber

Shlomo Weber is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 138 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (37 papers), Economic theories and models (30 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (1.3k citations), Atmospheric Science (677 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (434 citations). Shlomo Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michel Le Breton, Joseph Greenberg, Ignacio Ortuño‐Ortín, Victor Ginsburgh, Klaus Desmet, Hideo Konishi, Victor Ginsburgh, Shabtai Donnenfeld, E. Tuenter and Hans Wiesmeth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Econometrica and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026