David M. Lewis
- Anthropology top 2%
- Archeology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Classics top 10%
- Co-authors
- A. W. Pickard‐CambridgeJohn GouldJ. M. BigwoodRonald S. StroudCharles W. FornaraDavid WhiteheadPaul MacKendrickRobert D. Kirkcaldy
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers)Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (5 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- AnthropologyArcheologyClassics
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
David M. Lewis
22 papers receiving 185 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Anthropology 230
- Archeology 123
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- Philosophy 38
- Classics 29
Countries citing papers authored by David M. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Lewis. The network helps show where David M. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Lewis. David M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Another "ticking time bomb?" | 1 |
| 2 | Bohn's nodules, Epstein's pearls, and gingival cysts of the newborn: a new etiology and classification. | 5 |
| 3 | Verrucous oral lesions: possibly not so innocuous after all. Squamous papilloma. | 1 |
| 4 | Diffuse pigmentation of the palate. | 18 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | The dramatic festivals of Athensbreakdown → | 142 |
About David M. Lewis
David M. Lewis is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and Classics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (5 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (230 citations), Archeology (123 citations) and Classics (29 citations). David M. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include A. W. Pickard‐Cambridge, John Gould, J. M. Bigwood, Ronald S. Stroud, Charles W. Fornara, David Whitehead, Paul MacKendrick, Robert D. Kirkcaldy, Ann E. Jerse and Ν. G. L. Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, The Classical World and Phoenix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.