William M. Rodgers
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- William E. SpriggsSeth B. CarpenterLeslie S. StrattonJoseph E. ZveglichYana van der Meulen RodgersCharles StuartRichard B. FreemanSara R. Horowitz
- Topics
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (12 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers)Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
William M. Rodgers
29 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Economics and Econometrics 239
- Sociology and Political Science 213
- Gender Studies 109
- General Health Professions 79
- Demography 62
Countries citing papers authored by William M. Rodgers
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Rodgers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Rodgers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Rodgers. The network helps show where William M. Rodgers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Rodgers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Rodgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Rodgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Rodgers. William M. Rodgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | The Weak Jobs Recovery: Whatever Happened to "the Great American Jobs Machine"? | 5 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | How Does Gender Play a Role in the Earnings Gap? An Update. | 53 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 89 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | The politics of change | 3 |
| 20 | The people into parliament : an illustrated history of the labour party | 1 |
About William M. Rodgers
William M. Rodgers is a scholar working on Public Administration, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (109 citations), Economics and Econometrics (239 citations) and Public Administration (24 citations). William M. Rodgers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William E. Spriggs, Seth B. Carpenter, Leslie S. Stratton, Joseph E. Zveglich, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, Charles Stuart, Richard B. Freeman, Sara R. Horowitz, Janice Fanning Madden and Richard B. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, World Development and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.