William M. Goldman
- Geometry and Topology top 0.1%
- Mathematical Physics top 0.2%
- Applied Mathematics top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- John J. MillsonJoyce McCullochMorris W. HirschDavid FriedRoland SturmSuhyoung ChoiTodd A. DrummJohn R. Parker
- Topics
- Geometric and Algebraic Topology (49 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (37 papers)Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
William M. Goldman
112 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Geometry and Topology 2.3k
- Mathematical Physics 1.8k
- Applied Mathematics 744
- General Health Professions 335
- Algebra and Number Theory 299
Countries citing papers authored by William M. Goldman
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Goldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Goldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Goldman. The network helps show where William M. Goldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Goldman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Goldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Goldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Goldman. William M. Goldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | The deformation spaces of projectively flat structures on 2-orbifolds | 3 |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | DEFORMATION SPACES OF CONVEX REAL-PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES AND HYPERBOLIC AFFINE STRUCTURES | 5 |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | The fundamental group of a compact flat Lorentz space form is virtually polycyclic(TRANSFORMATION GROUPS AND REPRESENTATION THEORY) | 1 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About William M. Goldman
William M. Goldman is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 119 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (49 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (37 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (2.3k citations), Mathematical Physics (1.8k citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (244 citations). William M. Goldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include John J. Millson, Joyce McCulloch, Morris W. Hirsch, David Fried, Roland Sturm, Suhyoung Choi, Todd A. Drumm, John R. Parker, Brian Cuffel and Loren McCarter. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Health Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.