William M. Byne

86 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

William M. Byne
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
  • Social Psychology 492
  • Developmental Neuroscience 64
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 302
Replace Peter McGuffin with:
Peter McGuffin United Kingdom
Kim Wallen United States
Alexander Kolevzon United States
Bernhard Bogerts Germany
Hannes Pétursson United Kingdom
Linmarie Sikich United States
Dorothy E. Grice United States
Mamoru Tochigi Japan
Itaru Kushima Japan
Anu Raevuori Finland
William M. Byne relative to Peter McGuffin United Kingdom Peter McGuffin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Peter McGuffin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Byne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Byne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Byne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Byne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Byne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Byne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Byne. The network helps show where William M. Byne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William M. Byne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Byne Line = papers co-authored together William M. Byne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003385
2 1982299
3 2000260
4 2002211
5 2008200
6 2001181
7 1999178
8 2012165
9 2001164
10 1993150
11 2009142
12 1988127
13 2013121
14 2003119
15 2004104
16 201888
17 200084
18 201183
19 200179
20 201279

About William M. Byne

William M. Byne is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 89 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (32 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (14 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (13 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (3 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.6k citations), Social Psychology (492 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (64 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (302 citations). William M. Byne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Monte S. Buchsbaum, Eileen M. Kemether, Ruth Bleier, Erin A. Hazlett, Vahram H. Haroutunian, Stella M. Dracheva, M. Mehmet Haznedar, Kenneth L. Davis, Liesl B. Jones and Patrick R. Hof. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, Brain Research, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Homosexuality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact