Countries where authors publish in Journal of Homosexuality
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Homosexuality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Homosexuality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Homosexuality more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Homosexuality
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Homosexuality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Homosexuality.
About Journal of Homosexuality
The 3.1k papers published in Journal of Homosexuality in the last decades have received a total of 69.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Homosexuality usually cover Social Psychology (1.8k papers), Gender Studies (756 papers) and Reproductive Medicine (328 papers) specifically the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (1.7k papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (445 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (327 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (312 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (263 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (224 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (196 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (191 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Homosexuality are Vivienne C. Cass, Gregory M. Herek, Eli Coleman, Richard R. Troiden, Todd G. Morrison, Emilia Lombardi, Michèle J. Eliason, Wendell Ricketts, Melanie A. Morrison and Arnold H. Grossman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.