William L. Starch
Impact in
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Superconducting Materials and Applications
- General Materials Science top 10%
- Metallurgical and Alloy Processes
Papers in
-
- Superconducting Materials and Applications 22
- Co-authors
- D. C. Larbalestier (18 shared papers)Peter J. Lee (17 shared papers)A. Devred (6 shared papers)E. E. Hellstrom (2 shared papers)Jianyi Jiang (2 shared papers)Ulf Peter Trociewitz (2 shared papers)Fumitake Kametani (1 shared paper)Matthew C. Jewell (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Superconductor Science and Technology (9 papers)IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity (5 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceChina
In The Last Decade
William L. Starch
22 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Biomedical Engineering 388
- General Materials Science 11
- Condensed Matter Physics 13
- Mechanical Engineering 8
- Materials Chemistry 9
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Starch
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Starch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Starch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Starch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Starch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Starch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Starch. The network helps show where William L. Starch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Starch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 引抜きおよび圧延PITおよびRRP Nb 3 Snワイヤにおけるフィラメント歪とRRR(残留抵抗比)劣化との相関 | 2016 | 2 |
About William L. Starch
William L. Starch is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (388 citations), General Materials Science (11 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (13 citations), Mechanical Engineering (8 citations) and Materials Chemistry (9 citations). William L. Starch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include D. C. Larbalestier, Peter J. Lee, A. Devred, E. E. Hellstrom, Jianyi Jiang, Ulf Peter Trociewitz, Fumitake Kametani, Matthew C. Jewell, Ian Pong and Charlie Sanabria. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Scientific Reports, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.