P. Limon

18.3k total citations
67 papers, 671 citations indexed

About

P. Limon is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Limon has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 671 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 42 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 36 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in P. Limon's work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (39 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (33 papers). P. Limon is often cited by papers focused on Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (39 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (33 papers). P. Limon collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Switzerland. P. Limon's co-authors include Leon M. Lederman, J. H. Christenson, B. G. Pope, George Hicks, E. Zavattini, A.V. Zlobin, E. Barzi, R. Yamada, G. Ambrosio and D.R. Chichili and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

P. Limon

59 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
P. Limon United States 14 361 299 260 196 72 67 671
D. Gross United States 15 358 1.0× 139 0.5× 110 0.4× 117 0.6× 65 0.9× 34 557
H. Kirk United States 18 711 2.0× 129 0.4× 200 0.8× 201 1.0× 83 1.2× 135 1.0k
A.N. Skrinsky Russia 14 192 0.5× 157 0.5× 237 0.9× 301 1.5× 34 0.5× 57 598
A. Garren United States 9 152 0.4× 98 0.3× 127 0.5× 170 0.9× 68 0.9× 56 335
F. Mills United States 11 211 0.6× 76 0.3× 176 0.7× 172 0.9× 16 0.2× 68 493
J. M. Jowett Switzerland 12 242 0.7× 79 0.3× 110 0.4× 200 1.0× 30 0.4× 104 432
Ya. S. Derbenev United States 15 240 0.7× 193 0.6× 430 1.7× 558 2.8× 28 0.4× 65 703
Valeri Lebedev United States 11 166 0.5× 114 0.4× 262 1.0× 326 1.7× 16 0.2× 113 465
L. Groening Germany 14 203 0.6× 102 0.3× 404 1.6× 381 1.9× 68 0.9× 86 577
W. W. MacKay United States 10 129 0.4× 137 0.5× 205 0.8× 252 1.3× 11 0.2× 69 363

Countries citing papers authored by P. Limon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Limon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Limon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Limon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Limon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Limon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Limon. The network helps show where P. Limon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Limon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Limon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Limon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Limon. P. Limon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Limon, P.. (2022). The optimum energy of the really large hadron collider sited at Fermilab. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
2.
Limon, P.. (2007). Perspectives of Nb3Sn in Future Accelerator Magnets. ChemInform. 38(28).
3.
Ambrosio, G., N. Andreev, T. Arkan, et al.. (2003). Conceptual design of the Fermilab Nb/sub 3/Sn high field dipole model. Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366). 1. 174–176.
4.
Lamm, M.J., J. DiMarco, S. Fehér, et al.. (2002). A new facility to test superconducting accelerator magnets. Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 3. 3395–3397. 14 indexed citations
5.
Barzi, E., G. Ambrosio, N. Andreev, et al.. (2002). Superconductor and cable R&D for high field accelerator magnets at Fermilab. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 12(1). 1009–1013. 13 indexed citations
6.
Sabbi, G., S.A. Gourlay, J. Kerby, et al.. (2002). Magnetic design of a high gradient quadrupole for the LHC low-β insertions. Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 3. 3398–3400. 1 indexed citations
7.
Barzi, E., P. Limon, J. Ozelis, et al.. (2000). Heat treatment study of Nb/sub 3/Sn strands for the Fermilab's high field dipole model. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 10(1). 1000–1003. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bossert, R., J. DiMarco, S. Fehér, et al.. (1999). Quench protection studies of short model high gradient quadrupoles. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 1105–1108. 4 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Peter J., D. C. Larbalestier, M.T. Naus, et al.. (1999). Development of high performance multifilamentary Nb-Ti-Ta superconductor for LHC insertion quadrupoles. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 1571–1574. 9 indexed citations
10.
Snitchler, G., A. Ghosh, M. Harrison, et al.. (1999). The performance of Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O superconducting quadrupole coils. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 293–296. 2 indexed citations
11.
Limon, P., D. Orris, T. Peterson, et al.. (1997). A New Facility to Test Superconducting Accelerator Magnets in Superfluid Helium. 1 indexed citations
12.
Fehér, S., R. Bossert, J. DiMarco, et al.. (1997). Quench Protection of SC Quadrupole Magnets. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
13.
Bossert, R., S. Fehér, S.A. Gourlay, et al.. (1997). Tests of Fermilab low-β quadrupoles. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 7(2). 598–601. 1 indexed citations
14.
Aota, S., T. Asakawa, K. Hara, et al.. (1995). A scintillating tile/fiber system for the CDF plug upgrade EM calorimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 352(3). 557–568. 17 indexed citations
15.
Jöstlein, H., et al.. (1983). The Fermilab Tevatron: Vacuum for a superconducting storage ring. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films. 1(2). 187–195. 1 indexed citations
16.
Cook, V., George Hicks, P. Mockett, et al.. (1981). A measurement of the energy dependence of the inclusive yield of high-Pt events triggered by a large solid angle calorimeter. Nuclear Physics B. 186(2). 219–235.
17.
Bergé, P., D. Bogert, P. Limon, et al.. (1977). Proposal for a new neutrino detector at Fermilab. 1 indexed citations
18.
May, M., E. Aslanides, Leon M. Lederman, et al.. (1975). Scattering of 7-GeV Muons in Nuclei. Physical Review Letters. 35(7). 407–410. 22 indexed citations
19.
Kirk, T., M. J. Murtagh, M. J. Tannenbaum, et al.. (1974). Search for excited muons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 10(5). 1379–1386. 3 indexed citations
20.
Barney, J., P. Limon, S. L. Olsen, et al.. (1967). A spark chamber-computer system for measurement of proton polarization. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 54(1). 66–70. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026