IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

40.4k papers and 550.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 40.4k papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics in the last decades have received a total of 550.1k indexed citations. Papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (19.0k papers), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (15.7k papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (14.5k papers) specifically the topics of Magnetic Properties and Applications (11.6k papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (10.6k papers) and Electric Motor Design and Analysis (5.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics are G. Herzer, Z. Q. Zhu, R. Massart, D. Howe, T. L. Gilbert, G. Bertotti, I.D. Mayergoyz, David Jiles, H.N. Bertram and S. Iwasaki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Transactions on Magnetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025