William L. Leap
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Ellen LewinHeiko MotschenbacherAna DeumertRajend MesthrieJoan SwannRobert St. ClairSarah M. PikeGilbert Herdt
- Topics
- Gender Studies in Language (11 papers)Multilingual Education and Policy (10 papers)Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnual Review of AnthropologyMetabolic Engineering
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
William L. Leap
37 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 173
- Linguistics and Language 130
- Gender Studies 129
- Language and Linguistics 121
- Social Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Leap
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Leap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Leap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Leap more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Leap
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Leap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Leap. The network helps show where William L. Leap may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Leap
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Leap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Leap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Leap. William L. Leap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | Introducing Sociolinguistics (2nd Edition) | 32 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Out in the field : reflections of lesbian and gay anthropolgists | 38 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Beyond the lavender lexicon : authenticity, imagination, and appropriation in lesbian and gay languages | 57 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Written Ute English: Texture, Construction, and Point of View. | 2 |
| 20 | 9 |
About William L. Leap
William L. Leap is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Gender Studies and Language and Linguistics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Studies in Language (11 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (10 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (130 citations), Gender Studies (129 citations) and Language and Linguistics (121 citations). William L. Leap has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Lewin, Heiko Motschenbacher, Ana Deumert, Rajend Mesthrie, Joan Swann, Robert St. Clair, Sarah M. Pike, Gilbert Herdt, Kathleen O’Connor and Francis P. Conant. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annual Review of Anthropology and Metabolic Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.