Countries where authors publish in Metabolic Engineering
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Metabolic Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Metabolic Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metabolic Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Metabolic Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers published in Metabolic Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Metabolic Engineering.
About Metabolic Engineering
The 2.3k papers published in Metabolic Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 124.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Metabolic Engineering usually cover Molecular Biology (2.1k papers), Biochemistry (155 papers) and Biotechnology (174 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (1.5k papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (571 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (453 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (276 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (251 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (200 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (181 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Metabolic Engineering are Gregory Stephanopoulos, Maciek R. Antoniewicz, Jay D. Keasling, Jens Nielsen, James C. Liao, Wolfgang Wiechert, Hal S. Alper, Radhakrishnan Mahadevan, Christoph Wittmann and Ka‐Yiu San.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.