William L. Lanier

145 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

William L. Lanier
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Developmental Neuroscience 338
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 386
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 342
  • Neurology 644
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 152
Replace Jayant K. Deshpande with:
Jayant K. Deshpande United States
William D. White United States
Huiberdina L. Koek Netherlands
Manfred Blobner Germany
Mark Coburn Germany
Janette L. Vardy Australia
Bruno Neuner Germany
H J McQuay United Kingdom
Richard Kennedy United States
J. G. Rêves United States
William L. Lanier relative to Jayant K. Deshpande United States Jayant K. Deshpande's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Jayant K. Deshpande · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Lanier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Lanier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Lanier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Lanier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Lanier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Lanier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Lanier. The network helps show where William L. Lanier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Lanier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Lanier Line = papers co-authored together William L. Lanier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20181
2 201024
3 20092
4 200828
5 20086
6 20087
7 200811
8 200615
9 200524
10 20028
11 200211
12 200120
13 200010
14 19993
15 199817
16 199728
17 19968
18 199625
19 19951
20 19873

About William L. Lanier

William L. Lanier is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Medical Terminology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology, having authored 150 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (29 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (17 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (17 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (13 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (12 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (12 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (11 papers) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (338 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (386 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (342 citations), Neurology (644 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (152 citations). William L. Lanier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include James H. Milde, John D. Michenfelder, Christopher M. Burkle, Christopher M. Wittich, Jeffrey J. Pasternak, Bernd W. Scheithauer, Jonathan M. Holmes, David A. Leske, Keith H. Berge and Roger E. Hofer. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, Current Eye Research and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026