William J. Wainwright
- Philosophy top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Religious studies top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Robert AudiWilliam Lane CraigIrving SingerWilliam L. RowePaul DraperGordon GrahamJacob RossWilliam Hasker
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (21 papers)Karl Barth and Christian Theology (8 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Philosophical ReviewNoûs
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William J. Wainwright
41 papers receiving 199 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 195
- Sociology and Political Science 49
- Social Psychology 40
- Religious studies 31
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Wainwright
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Wainwright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Wainwright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Wainwright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Wainwright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Wainwright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Wainwright. The network helps show where William J. Wainwright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Wainwright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Wainwright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Wainwright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Wainwright. William J. Wainwright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Rethinking Philosophy of Religion: a Dialogue | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment | 46 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Philosophy of religion : an annotated bibliography of twentieth-century writings in English | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About William J. Wainwright
William J. Wainwright is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (21 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (8 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (195 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations). William J. Wainwright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Audi, William Lane Craig, Irving Singer, William L. Rowe, Paul Draper, Gordon Graham, Jacob Ross, William Hasker, William J. Abraham and Nicholas Wolterstorff. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.