Stephen T. Davis

2.8k citations
74 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 16
Topics
Theology and Philosophy of Evil (22 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers)Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (11 papers)

In The Last Decade

Stephen T. Davis

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen T. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Biology 500
  • Oncology 403
  • Genetics 267
  • Philosophy 251
  • Biotechnology 145
Replace D. R. Shackleton Bailey with:
D. R. Shackleton Bailey United States
Ian Donaldson Norway
Jonathan H. Sheehan United States
Tim Jensen Denmark
Andrew S. Moore Australia
R.J. Hodgkiss United Kingdom
Satoshi Sato Japan
Keith Roberts United Kingdom
Michael Lerner United States
Brian Miller United States
Stephen T. Davis relative to D. R. Shackleton Bailey United States D. R. Shackleton Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
D. R. Shackleton Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen T. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen T. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen T. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen T. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen T. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen T. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen T. Davis. The network helps show where Stephen T. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen T. Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen T. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen T. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen T. Davis. Stephen T. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 26
3
The redemption: an Interdisciplinary Symposium on Christ as Redeemer
8
4
The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God
14
5 169
6 21
7 9
8
The Trinity : an interdisciplinary symposium on the Trinity
21
9 5
10 42
11 17
12 8
13 11
14 15
15 0
16 5
17 1
18 13
19
The use of certain chemicals as co-agents with selected enzymes for removal of protein from sweet whey.
2
20 8

About Stephen T. Davis

Stephen T. Davis is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Oncology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (22 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (251 citations), Biotechnology (145 citations) and Oncology (403 citations). Stephen T. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Brian E. Huber, Elizabeth A. Austin, C A Richards, Steven S. Good, David P. Baccanari, T Spector, V C Knick, Huizhen Zhao, Baoguang Zhao and Bin‐Bing S. Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026