William J. Scanlon
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Judith FederWilliam G. WeissertJohn HolahanW. Lee HansenBurton A. WeisbrodHoward H. GoldmanThomas T. H. WanDiane Skinner
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers)Global Health Care Issues (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William J. Scanlon
27 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- General Health Professions 391
- Economics and Econometrics 229
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- Demography 74
- Health 53
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Scanlon
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Scanlon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Scanlon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Scanlon. The network helps show where William J. Scanlon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Scanlon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Scanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Scanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Scanlon. William J. Scanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | Medigap: Current Policies Contain Coverage Gaps, Undermine Cost Control Incentives | 1 |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | A perspective on long-term care for the elderly. | 12 |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | The long-term care marketplace: an overview. | 3 |
| 13 | Nursing home cost function analysis: a critique. | 3 |
| 14 | Care for the chronically ill: nursing home incentive payment experience. | 33 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | Can fee-for-service reimbursement coexist with demand creation? | 28 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | Price controls, physician fees, and physician incomes from Medicare and Medicaid | 21 |
| 20 | Schooling and Earnings of Low Achievers | 41 |
About William J. Scanlon
William J. Scanlon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (391 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (37 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (229 citations). William J. Scanlon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith Feder, William G. Weissert, John Holahan, W. Lee Hansen, Burton A. Weisbrod, Howard H. Goldman, Thomas T. H. Wan, Diane Skinner, Marilyn Moon and Helen L. Smits. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.