Judith Feder

1.5k citations
62 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Judith Feder

61 papers receiving 970 citations

Peers

Judith Feder
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • General Health Professions 794
  • Economics and Econometrics 624
  • Health 136
  • Demography 129
  • Finance 94
Replace Helen C. Lazenby with:
Helen C. Lazenby United States
Daniel R. Waldo United States
Stanley S. Wallack United States
Jessica S. Banthin United States
Teresa A. Coughlin United States
Alison Evans Cuellar United States
Nelda McCall United States
Mark S. Freeland United States
A. Paul Williams Canada
Antonio Giulio de Belvis Italy
Judith Feder relative to Helen C. Lazenby United States Helen C. Lazenby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Helen C. Lazenby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Feder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Feder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Feder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Feder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Feder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Feder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Feder. The network helps show where Judith Feder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Feder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Feder Line = papers co-authored together Judith Feder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20158
2 201512
3 201316
4 20129
5 20117
6 201127
7 200584
8 20045
9 20032
10
Can Medicare survive its saviors?
19992
11 19999
12 19995
13
Medicare spending for elderly beneficiaries who need long-term care.
199810
14
Thoughts on the future of Medicare.
19961
15
Medicaid financing crisis : balancing responsibilities, priorities, and dollars
199315
16 199227
17 19902
18 198912
19
Hospital responses to Medicare's Prospective Payment System.
19852
20
Medicare : the politics of Federal hospital insurance
197729

About Judith Feder

Judith Feder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (37 papers), Global Health Care Issues (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (794 citations), Economics and Econometrics (624 citations) and Health (136 citations). Judith Feder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack Hadley, Harriet Komisar, William J. Scanlon, Marlene Niefeld, Stephen Zuckerman, Ross M.Mullner, Judith D. Kasper, J Hadley, Diane Rowland and Larry Levitt. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Health Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026