William J. Durch
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Development top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eliot A. CohenFrancis FukuyamaRobert JohansenA. B. FetherstonDaniel DruckmanPaul F. DiehlSteven R. RatnerPaul C. Stern
- Topics
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics (9 papers)Peacebuilding and International Security (4 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
William J. Durch
20 papers receiving 190 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Sociology and Political Science 192
- Political Science and International Relations 163
- Development 70
- Economics and Econometrics 23
- History 15
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Durch
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Durch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Durch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Durch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Durch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Durch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Durch. The network helps show where William J. Durch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Durch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Durch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Durch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Durch. William J. Durch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An Innovation Agenda for UN 75 : The Albright-Gambari Commission and the Road to 2020 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Twenty-first-century peace operations | 44 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | Naval arms control: Tons of options? | 0 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | The ABM Treaty and Western security | 2 |
| 17 | The future of the ABM treaty | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | Information Processing and Outcome Forecasting for Multilateral Negotiations: Testing One Approach, | 11 |
About William J. Durch
William J. Durch is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (9 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (4 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (163 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (192 citations). William J. Durch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eliot A. Cohen, Francis Fukuyama, Robert Johansen, A. B. Fetherston, Daniel Druckman, Paul F. Diehl, Steven R. Ratner, Paul C. Stern, Joris Larik and Barry M. Blechman. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, International Organization and International Security.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.