J. E. Spence
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Development top 5%
- Law top 5%
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Colin S. GrayMichael NewmanSarah BennettDavid A. WelshJacinta DouglasKate D’CruzNeville AlexanderPaul Nugent
- Topics
- Legal Issues in South Africa (8 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers)International Development and Aid (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
J. E. Spence
42 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 120
- Political Science and International Relations 92
- Development 46
- Law 26
- History 23
Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Spence
This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Spence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Spence
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Spence. The network helps show where J. E. Spence may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. E. Spence
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. E. Spence. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. E. Spence based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. E. Spence. J. E. Spence is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | After Mandela: The 1999 South African Elections | 9 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | Het debat over Zuid-Afrika's buitenlands beleid | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Nations : a survey of the twentieth century | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Reform in South Africa: A Tangled Web | 1 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | South Africa: reform versus reaction | 1 |
| 15 | South African foreign policy: changing perspectives | 1 |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Basutoland comes to independence | 1 |
| 20 | 3 |
About J. E. Spence
J. E. Spence is a scholar working on Development, Law and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Issues in South Africa (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers) and International Development and Aid (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (92 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (120 citations). J. E. Spence has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Colin S. Gray, Michael Newman, Sarah Bennett, David A. Welsh, Jacinta Douglas, Kate D’Cruz, Neville Alexander, Paul Nugent, Di Winkler and Athena S. Leoussi. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, International Affairs and The Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.