William Hamilton

40 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

William Hamilton
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Human-Computer Interaction 288
  • Applied Psychology 152
  • Rehabilitation 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Sensory Systems 30
Replace Bryan Smith with:
Bryan Smith United States
Marco Laurino Italy
Katherine Wild United States
John Hansen Denmark
Patrick Kenny United States
Przemysław Guzik Poland
David Putrino United States
Danilo Menicucci Italy
Shahina Pardhan United Kingdom
Min Hane Aung United Kingdom
William Hamilton relative to Bryan Smith United States Bryan Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Bryan Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hamilton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hamilton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hamilton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hamilton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hamilton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hamilton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hamilton. The network helps show where William Hamilton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hamilton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hamilton Line = papers co-authored together William Hamilton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
ON QUATERNIONS, OR ON A NEW SYSTEM OF IMAGINARIES IN ALGEBRA
2000185
2 2005140
3 2017130
4 2019113
5 201695
6 202056
7 200448
8 202047
9 202047
10 202044
11
Radical theology and the death of God
196644
12 201943
13 201041
14 201931
15 201027
16 202124
17 200422
18 200719
19
Discussions on Philosophy and Literature, Education and University Reform
200719
20 202314

About William Hamilton

William Hamilton is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (288 citations), Applied Psychology (152 citations), Rehabilitation (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations) and Sensory Systems (30 citations). William Hamilton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Philip Lindner, Per Carlbring, Alexander Miloff, Gerhard Andersson, Lena Reuterskiöld, Thomas L. Lenz, Thomas J. J. Altizer, Mark B. Powers, Michael S. Monaghan and Sung Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Theology Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact