Thomas J. J. Altizer
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (9 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Academy of ReligionInternational Studies in PhilosophyJournal of Religious Ethics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. J. Altizer
28 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Philosophy 79
- Religious studies 52
- Literature and Literary Theory 23
- Political Science and International Relations 16
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. J. Altizer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. J. Altizer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. J. Altizer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. J. Altizer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. J. Altizer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. J. Altizer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. J. Altizer. The network helps show where Thomas J. J. Altizer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. J. Altizer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. J. Altizer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. J. Altizer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. J. Altizer. Thomas J. J. Altizer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | The Genesis of God: A Theological Genealogy | 4 |
| 7 | Theology at the end of the century : a dialogue on the postmodern | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | History as apocalypse | 9 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Deconstruction and Theology | 15 |
| 13 | John Cobb's theology in process | 4 |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | The new apocalypse: the radical Christian vision of William Blake | 9 |
| 17 | America and the future of theology | 2 |
| 18 | The gospel of Christian atheism | 28 |
| 19 | Truth, myth, and symbol | 4 |
| 20 | Oriental mysticism and biblical eschatology | 5 |
About Thomas J. J. Altizer
Thomas J. J. Altizer is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (9 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (52 citations), Philosophy (79 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (102 citations). Thomas J. J. Altizer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Hamilton, David Ray Griffin and Mark C. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Religion, International Studies in Philosophy and Journal of Religious Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.