Lilas Ali
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 6
-
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness 7
- Co-authors
- Inger Ekman (20 shared papers)Andreas Fors (22 shared papers)Ingela Skärsäter (6 shared papers)Barbro Krevers (5 shared papers)Karl Swedberg (9 shared papers)Sara Wallström (8 shared papers)Britt Hedman Ahlström (2 shared papers)Hanna Gyllensten (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (7 papers)BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)BMC Health Services Research (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenQatarUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lilas Ali
37 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Applied Psychology 52
- General Health Professions 227
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 37
- Clinical Psychology 110
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
Countries citing papers authored by Lilas Ali
This map shows the geographic impact of Lilas Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lilas Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lilas Ali more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lilas Ali
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lilas Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lilas Ali. The network helps show where Lilas Ali may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lilas Ali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 9 |
About Lilas Ali
Lilas Ali is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (12 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers) and Family Support in Illness (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (52 citations), General Health Professions (227 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (37 citations), Clinical Psychology (110 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations). Lilas Ali has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Inger Ekman, Andreas Fors, Ingela Skärsäter, Barbro Krevers, Karl Swedberg, Sara Wallström, Britt Hedman Ahlström, Hanna Gyllensten, Nils Sjöström and Margda Wærn. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Psychiatry, BMC Health Services Research, PLoS ONE and JMIR Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.