William H. Redmond

67 total papers · 791 total citations
49 papers, 568 citations indexed

About

William H. Redmond is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, William H. Redmond has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 568 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 11 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 10 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in William H. Redmond's work include Economic Theory and Institutions (12 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (10 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers). William H. Redmond is often cited by papers focused on Economic Theory and Institutions (12 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (10 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers). William H. Redmond collaborates with scholars based in United States and Latvia. William H. Redmond's co-authors include Michael M. Pearson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Preventive Medicine and Journal of Product Innovation Management.

In The Last Decade

William H. Redmond

46 papers receiving 476 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William H. Redmond 143 128 116 112 96 49 568
Jaana Woiceshyn 71 0.5× 67 0.5× 86 0.7× 235 2.1× 57 0.6× 31 629
Libby Weber 89 0.6× 58 0.5× 70 0.6× 380 3.4× 88 0.9× 25 689
Henry Kofi Mensah 48 0.3× 97 0.8× 78 0.7× 132 1.2× 17 0.2× 54 549
Nausheen Syed 77 0.5× 109 0.9× 101 0.9× 138 1.2× 25 0.3× 30 524
Thomas Callahan 49 0.3× 40 0.3× 56 0.5× 244 2.2× 62 0.6× 34 609
Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru 105 0.7× 76 0.6× 122 1.1× 98 0.9× 38 0.4× 49 512
Michael P. Schlaile 96 0.7× 105 0.8× 135 1.2× 183 1.6× 63 0.7× 28 574
Philip Stern 73 0.5× 280 2.2× 121 1.0× 54 0.5× 85 0.9× 31 504
Ana Pinto Borges 80 0.6× 156 1.2× 209 1.8× 45 0.4× 9 0.1× 85 576
Tommi Tapanainen 60 0.4× 81 0.6× 121 1.0× 145 1.3× 53 0.6× 27 547

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Redmond. The network helps show where William H. Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Redmond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Redmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Redmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Redmond. William H. Redmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026