William H. Brock
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Education
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey JohnsonDonald CardwellA. J. MeadowsJane Gary HarrisRoy MacLeodGeorge B. KauffmanBrian E. WoolnoughBrian Gee
- Topics
- History and advancements in chemistry (25 papers)History of Science and Natural History (16 papers)History of Science and Medicine (16 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of SciencePhysical and Theoretical ChemistryTheoretical Computer Science
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
William H. Brock
74 papers receiving 471 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- History and Philosophy of Science 196
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 104
- Education 58
- History 50
- Sociology and Political Science 34
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Brock
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Brock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Brock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Brock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Brock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Brock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Brock. The network helps show where William H. Brock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Brock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Brock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Brock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Brock. William H. Brock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Book Reviews-Biographies-Justus von Liebig: The Chemical Gatekeeper | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | The lamp of learning : Taylor & Francis and the development of science publishing | 10 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | The Patronage of Science in the Nineteenth Century | 21 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About William H. Brock
William H. Brock is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 92 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and advancements in chemistry (25 papers), History of Science and Natural History (16 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (196 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (104 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations). William H. Brock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Johnson, Donald Cardwell, A. J. Meadows, Jane Gary Harris, Roy MacLeod, George B. Kauffman, Brian E. Woolnough, Brian Gee, Kai Jensen and Christian K. Jørgensen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Chemical Society Reviews and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.