William H. Baumer

610 total citations
14 papers, 192 citations indexed

About

William H. Baumer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William H. Baumer has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 192 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1 paper in History and Philosophy of Science and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in William H. Baumer's work include Economic and Technological Innovation (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper). William H. Baumer is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Technological Innovation (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper). William H. Baumer collaborates with scholars based in United States. William H. Baumer's co-authors include Robert Paul Wolff, Wesley C. Salmon, Julius Weinberg and Daniel Lerner and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

William H. Baumer

10 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William H. Baumer United States 6 83 46 38 38 28 14 192
John Boler United States 7 122 1.5× 70 1.5× 26 0.7× 10 0.3× 20 0.7× 22 188
Friedrich Waismann United Kingdom 8 84 1.0× 25 0.5× 44 1.2× 8 0.2× 20 0.7× 19 149
John A. Mourant United States 6 58 0.7× 36 0.8× 27 0.7× 5 0.1× 23 0.8× 29 126
John G. Slater United States 7 40 0.5× 52 1.1× 43 1.1× 33 0.9× 53 1.9× 40 174
Renford Bambrough United States 7 111 1.3× 19 0.4× 28 0.7× 11 0.3× 26 0.9× 30 172
Theodore Scaltsas United Kingdom 8 89 1.1× 32 0.7× 46 1.2× 10 0.3× 16 0.6× 30 145
J. L. Ackrill United Kingdom 9 144 1.7× 23 0.5× 25 0.7× 8 0.2× 20 0.7× 15 210
John Wisdom United Kingdom 7 55 0.7× 19 0.4× 13 0.3× 9 0.2× 28 1.0× 15 134
John F. Wippel United States 10 258 3.1× 52 1.1× 25 0.7× 8 0.2× 38 1.4× 39 324
Norman Gulley United Kingdom 8 191 2.3× 42 0.9× 18 0.5× 10 0.3× 19 0.7× 41 265

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Baumer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Baumer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Baumer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Baumer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Baumer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Baumer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Baumer. The network helps show where William H. Baumer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Baumer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Baumer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Baumer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Baumer. William H. Baumer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Baumer, William H.. (1982). Kant's Rational Theology. Philosophical Topics. 13(9999). 181–186. 14 indexed citations
2.
Baumer, William H., et al.. (1982). Darby's Rangers: We Led the Way.. Military Affairs. 46(1). 46–46. 1 indexed citations
3.
Baumer, William H.. (1971). Science and civilization in Islam. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2(2). 183–190. 45 indexed citations
4.
Baumer, William H. & Wesley C. Salmon. (1969). The Foundations of Scientific Inference.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 29(3). 472–472. 30 indexed citations
5.
Baumer, William H., et al.. (1968). Kant's Solution for Verification in Metaphysics.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 28(4). 611–611. 1 indexed citations
6.
Baumer, William H.. (1967). Kant on Cosmological Arguments. The Monist. 51(4). 519–535. 1 indexed citations
7.
Baumer, William H.. (1967). Indefensible impersonal egoism. Philosophical Studies. 18(5). 72–75. 2 indexed citations
8.
Baumer, William H. & Julius Weinberg. (1966). Abstraction, Relation, and Induction.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 27(1). 120–120. 22 indexed citations
9.
Baumer, William H.. (1965). Invalidly Invalidating a Paradox. The Philosophical Quarterly. 15(61). 350–350.
10.
Baumer, William H., et al.. (1965). The Philosophy of Malebranche: A Study of His Integration of Faith, Reason, and Experimental Observation.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 26(1). 141–141. 1 indexed citations
11.
Baumer, William H. & Robert Paul Wolff. (1964). Kant's Theory of Mental Activity.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 25(1). 133–133. 63 indexed citations
12.
Baumer, William H. & Daniel Lerner. (1964). Parts and Wholes.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 25(1). 135–135. 3 indexed citations
13.
Baumer, William H.. (1964). CONFIRMATION WITHOUT PARADOXES. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 15(59). 177–195. 9 indexed citations
14.
Baumer, William H.. (1962). Anselm, Truth, and Necessary Being. Philosophy. 37(141). 257–258.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026