Michael Hooker
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- Historical Philosophy and Science 1
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 1
- Law 2
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 2
- Co-authors
- Bernard Williams (1 shared paper)Dalia Judovitz (1 shared paper)Mark Pastin (1 shared paper)Enrique Becerril‐Villanueva (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Noûs (3 papers)Teaching Philosophy (1 paper)MLN (1 paper)Social Philosophy and Policy (1 paper)Grazer Philosophische Studien (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Hooker
10 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- History and Philosophy of Science 78
- Philosophy 104
- Theoretical Computer Science 5
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 36
- Information Systems and Management 20
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hooker
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hooker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hooker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hooker. The network helps show where Michael Hooker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1979 | 24 | |
| 4 | Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays | 1982 | 20 |
| 5 | 1980 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 11 | The President's action plan for the year 2000: improving quality and responsiveness at UMASS through restructuring, reallocation and reinvestment | 1995 | 1 |
About Michael Hooker
Michael Hooker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 11 papers that have together received 160 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper), Business Law and Ethics (1 paper) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (78 citations), Philosophy (104 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (36 citations) and Information Systems and Management (20 citations). Michael Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Williams, Dalia Judovitz, Mark Pastin and Enrique Becerril‐Villanueva. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Teaching Philosophy, MLN, Social Philosophy and Policy and Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.