William G. Bade

1.2k citations
31 papers · 833 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

William G. Bade

30 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

William G. Bade
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Algebra and Number Theory 410
  • Mathematical Physics 569
  • Applied Mathematics 293
  • Geometry and Topology 124
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 215
Replace Bertram Yood with:
Bertram Yood United States
Philip C. Curtis United States
Arlen Brown United States
K. de Leeuw United States
Domingo A. Herrero United States
Florian-Horia Vasilescu France
John W. Bunce United States
S. J. Bernau United States
Mary R. Embry United States
Paul Milnes Canada
William G. Bade relative to Bertram Yood United States Bertram Yood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Bertram Yood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Bade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Bade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Bade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Bade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Bade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Bade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Bade. The network helps show where William G. Bade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside William G. Bade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Bade Line = papers co-authored together William G. Bade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987141
2 195576
3 196061
4 196250
5 195449
6 196641
7 195440
8 195537
9 197337
10
Spectral theory : self adjoint operators in Hilbert space
196333
11 196033
12 195932
13 198332
14 195331
15 198126
16 199924
17 197418
18 197812
19 198910
20 19929

About William G. Bade

William G. Bade is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (11 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (10 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (8 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (4 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (3 papers) and Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (410 citations), Mathematical Physics (569 citations), Applied Mathematics (293 citations), Geometry and Topology (124 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (215 citations). William G. Bade has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Curtis, H. G. Dales, Jacob T. Schwartz, Nelson Dunford, Robert G. Bartle, Kjeld Laursen and Allan M. Sinclair. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Journal of Functional Analysis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Studia Mathematica and Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact