William F. Sater
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Simon CollierMichael MonteónHarold BlakemoreAbraham F. LowenthalMaurice ZeitlinBrian Michael JenkinsHolger H. HerwigBruce Hoffman
- Topics
- Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (23 papers)Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (7 papers)International Relations in Latin America (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William F. Sater
36 papers receiving 186 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 139
- Political Science and International Relations 91
- Demography 48
- Economics and Econometrics 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Sater
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Sater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Sater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Sater more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Sater
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Sater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Sater. The network helps show where William F. Sater may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Sater
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Sater. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Sater based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Sater. William F. Sater is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Historia de Chile 1808-1994 | 4 |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Nacionalismo económico y reforma tributaria a fines del siglo XIX en Chile | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | El movimiento de la izquierda revolucionaria y chile | 2 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About William F. Sater
William F. Sater is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 41 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (23 papers), Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (7 papers) and International Relations in Latin America (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (48 citations), Political Science and International Relations (91 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (139 citations). William F. Sater has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Simon Collier, Michael Monteón, Harold Blakemore, Abraham F. Lowenthal, Maurice Zeitlin, Brian Michael Jenkins, Holger H. Herwig, Bruce Hoffman, Donald E. Worcester and David Ronfeldt. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.