William F. Chaplin
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Eric HollanderStacey WassermanLatha SooryaEvdokia AnagnostouLewis R. GoldbergPeter M. LewinsohnAntoinette SchoenthalerWalter Mischel
- Topics
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (21 papers)Cardiac Health and Mental Health (18 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of the American College of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William F. Chaplin
132 papers receiving 7.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Clinical Psychology 2.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
- Social Psychology 1.7k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Chaplin. The network helps show where William F. Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Chaplin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Chaplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Chaplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Chaplin. William F. Chaplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 66 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | Abstract 14790: Polypharmacy is a Predictor of Medication Non-adherence after Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Electronic Medication Monitoring Study | 1 |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 125 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 146 |
About William F. Chaplin
William F. Chaplin is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 8.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (21 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (18 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (363 citations), Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations). William F. Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric Hollander, Stacey Wasserman, Latha Soorya, Evdokia Anagnostou, Lewis R. Goldberg, Peter M. Lewinsohn, Antoinette Schoenthaler, Walter Mischel, Russell Barton and Oliver P. John. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.