Ellen‐ge Denton

581 citations
16 papers · 207 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Resilience and Mental Health

Papers in

Ellen‐ge Denton

16 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Ellen‐ge Denton
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Clinical Psychology 127
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Social Psychology 49
  • Health 19
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
Replace Jacqueline Homel with:
Jacqueline Homel Canada
Lynne Gabriel United Kingdom
Małgorzata Woźniak‐Prus Poland
Simona Skripkauskaitė United Kingdom
Bita Ghafoori United States
Lian Taljaard South Africa
K. Jessica Van Vliet Canada
Addie N. Merians United States
Hugo S. Gomes Portugal
Ellen‐ge Denton relative to Jacqueline Homel Canada Jacqueline Homel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Jacqueline Homel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen‐ge Denton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen‐ge Denton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen‐ge Denton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen‐ge Denton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen‐ge Denton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen‐ge Denton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen‐ge Denton. The network helps show where Ellen‐ge Denton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen‐ge Denton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen‐ge Denton Line = papers co-authored together Ellen‐ge Denton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202249
2 202327
3 201623
4 201918
5 201717
6 202415
7 201214
8 201211
9 20208
10 20216
11 20155
12 20244
13 20154
14 20123
15 20222
16 20241

About Ellen‐ge Denton

Ellen‐ge Denton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (127 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations), Social Psychology (49 citations), Health (19 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations). Ellen‐ge Denton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Christina W. Hoven, George J. Musa, William F. Chaplin, Regina Miranda, Christina Shane‐Simpson, Patricia J. Brooks, Rita Obeid, Kristen Gillespie‐Lynch, Karina W. Davidson and Nina Rieckmann. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, American Psychologist, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Research in autism spectrum disorders and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact