William E. Brugger
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Papers in
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 1
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 1
-
- Surface Chemistry and Catalysis 1
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 1
- Co-authors
- Peter C. Jurs (3 shared papers)Louis D. Lowry (1 shared paper)Richard L. Doty (1 shared paper)Peter J. Snyder (1 shared paper)A. J. Stuper (1 shared paper)Morris Milner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)Physiology & Behavior (1 paper)Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (1 paper)Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
William E. Brugger
5 papers receiving 562 citations
William E. Brugger's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Sensory Systems 479
- Nutrition and Dietetics 245
- Biomedical Engineering 289
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 115
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Brugger
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Brugger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Brugger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Brugger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Brugger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Brugger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Brugger. The network helps show where William E. Brugger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside William E. Brugger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans Hit paper breakdown → | 1978 | 530 |
| 2 | 1975 | 33 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 12 |
About William E. Brugger
William E. Brugger is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron oxide chemistry and applications (1 paper), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (1 paper), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (479 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (245 citations), Biomedical Engineering (289 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (115 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations). William E. Brugger has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Jurs, Louis D. Lowry, Richard L. Doty, Peter J. Snyder, A. J. Stuper and Morris Milner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Physiology & Behavior, Analytical Chemistry, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing and Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.