William E. Ackerman

120 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

William E. Ackerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 330
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 203
  • Pharmacology 394
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 374
  • Immunology 284
Replace Tomasz Rechberger with:
Tomasz Rechberger Poland
Sven Seiwerth Croatia
Giovanni Muzzonigro Italy
Simon T. Dillon United States
R. Punnonen Finland
Luo‐Ping Ger Taiwan
Riitta Salonen Finland
Omar Qureshi United Kingdom
Jean‐Pierre Kantelip France
Damien Bennett United Kingdom
William E. Ackerman relative to Tomasz Rechberger Poland Tomasz Rechberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Tomasz Rechberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Ackerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Ackerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Ackerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Ackerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Ackerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Ackerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Ackerman. The network helps show where William E. Ackerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Ackerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Ackerman Line = papers co-authored together William E. Ackerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007221
2 2020110
3 201179
4 200572
5 199267
6 200662
7 200761
8 201550
9 201446
10 201143
11 201242
12 200842
13 200740
14 200440
15 200539
16 201338
17 198933
18 201433
19 201032
20 198031

About William E. Ackerman

William E. Ackerman is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 125 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (30 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (21 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (14 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (14 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (11 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (330 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (203 citations), Pharmacology (394 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (374 citations) and Immunology (284 citations). William E. Ackerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Mahmood Ahmad, Douglas A. Kniss, John M. Robinson, Taryn Summerfield, Dale D. Vandré, Jun‐Ming Zhang, Brad H. Rovin, Irina A. Buhimschi, Peter J. D. Andrews and D. D. Vandré. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biology of Reproduction, Anesthesia & Analgesia and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact