Biology of Reproduction

16.5k papers and 669.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.5k papers published in Biology of Reproduction in the last decades have received a total of 669.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Biology of Reproduction usually cover Reproductive Medicine (6.5k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (6.0k papers) and Molecular Biology (4.4k papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5.5k papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4.0k papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biology of Reproduction are Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Fuller W. Bazer, John J. Eppig, Thomas E. Spencer, Susan S. Suárez, J. E. Fortune, Michael D. Griswold, Lawrence L. Espey, Don W. Fawcett and Martin Dym.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biology of Reproduction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biology of Reproduction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biology of Reproduction.

Countries where authors publish in Biology of Reproduction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biology of Reproduction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biology of Reproduction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biology of Reproduction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025